<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interbrand Design Forum &#187; Green Retail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/category/green-retail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com</link>
	<description>Retail Brand Consultancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Brand Voice Includes Corporate Citizenship</title>
		<link>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/brand-voice-includes-corporate-citizenship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/brand-voice-includes-corporate-citizenship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brand assets and touch points are like words in a sentence. By themselves they might have their own independent meaning, but when combined they add up to convey a larger meaning and message or voice. Everything a brand says or does has an impact on a brand’s voice.<a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sound-waves.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1042" title="sound waves" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sound-waves.png" alt="" width="150" height="248" /></a>

Historically brands and the business they represent were viewed by the general public simply as a business, with basic economic and strategic issues to deal with. However, right now we are witnessing a shift in the way consumers think about brands. Consumers are now seeing brands more as living, breathing entities with personalities and voices all their own. As a result, brands are being asked to act more like good citizens and have an overall net positive impact on the world or at the very least to limit their negative impact.

It wasn’t that long ago that the majority of consumers had no clue about a product’s life cycle. They didn’t know or care where their food came from. They had no idea what a brand’s policy on energy was of if it recycled. Consumers didn’t think about human rights issues in the factories of the developing world.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/brand-voice-includes-corporate-citizenship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Believe the Hype About new Generation of LEDs.</title>
		<link>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/believe-the-hype-about-new-generation-of-leds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/believe-the-hype-about-new-generation-of-leds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Raberding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Store Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail architects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Interior Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I have spent the last five years convinced that the marketing hype was just that—hype. Mostly from reading countless advertisements for LED lighting products that play on unsuspecting readers with questionable claims, such as Long life! Excellent color! High efficiency!  Brighter!<a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/LEDTimR.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-811" title="LEDTimR" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/LEDTimR-300x250.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="250" /></a>

Well, what were previously exaggerated claims are now coming to be real. LED lighting products are here to stay. And the bubbling pot is about to explode. After years of refinements, and new industry regulation, the products are consistently better performers than the previous generation.

The US Department of Energy has developed a labeling program (I think it is voluntary) that provides a means of consistency for describing LED performance. It addresses Light Output, Watts, Efficacy, Color Rendering Index and Correlated Color Temperature. Or Brightness, Energy, Efficiency, Color Accuracy and Light Color.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/believe-the-hype-about-new-generation-of-leds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Sustainability Commitments: Between a Rock and a Hard Place</title>
		<link>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/our-sustainability-commitments-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/our-sustainability-commitments-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Twiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental initiatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<h5>"Each of us must work for his own highest development, accepting at the same time his share of responsibility in the general life of humanity—our particular duty being to aid those to whom we think we can be most useful." –Marie Curie</h5>
In a world where we are so quick to assign blame, BP’s name is currently mud.  News stories, blogposts and articles suggesting that BP should be nailed to the cross for the latest major oil spill have been the norm for the past month. One result of this spill is that no one knows exactly how many gallons have spewed into the Gulf. Reports range from 200,000 gallons to 4.2 million gallons <em>per day</em>. I never excelled in math, but to state 200,000 with a possibility that, “Oh, we could be off by 4 million gallons,” seems to indicate that no one really knows how bad this could be. By the latest estimates, the spill has surpassed the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill (11 million gallons) to become the largest environmental disaster in US history. 
<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-653" title="earth" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/earth.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" />

If BP, who by the way has invested over 4 billion dollars in alternate energy initiatives since 2005, is now being deemed as the poster child of anti-Mother Earth, where does that leave the rest of us?  I believe it leaves us in an odd predicament—caught between striving to be good corporate citizens and managing the latest PR backlash from polluting, using child labor, releasing toxic chemicals into the atmosphere…drinking from a Styrofoam cup, not recycling printer cartridges, or even God forbid using an incandescent light bulb.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/our-sustainability-commitments-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retail Rollouts: Sustainability is not an Afterthought</title>
		<link>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Rethman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experience Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be most effective, a sustainability initiative must be approached holistically. Sustainability and brand thinking are alike in that they radiate outward from the heart of the business. Just as brand is part of everyone’s job, sustainability can be too. Both brand and sustainability strategies are ideally intertwined, well thought out and well executed from vision to prototype. Typically, companies with this kind of forethought get high marks for differentiation and credibility, such as Whole Foods Market and Starbucks. There’s a direct benefit to the value of the brand. <a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Oak_leaves.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-503" title="Oak_leaves" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Oak_leaves-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a> 

Whether a company has a long history of social responsibility or a newly awakened desire to conserve resources, there are trusted ways to make decisions based on return on investment. If a large fleet of stores is in need of image refreshing, that’s an opportunity to look at controlling energy costs and sustainable building strategies. Even stores primarily in tenant spaces can look at a healthier environment and LEED certification. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interbranddesignforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

